Our mission is to make a positive difference in the career and lives of Aligarh Muslim University Students and Alumni of AMU.

Yadoon Ke Jharoke

Its dedicated to MINTO CIRCLE AND everyone who belong to it.
Ek idara hai ek rishta hai aur ek zindagi hai ...

Read more...
 
Teachers’ Agitation: Some Tips to the VC Print E-mail
Written by Zafar Khan   
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
To

The Vice-Chancellor
Aligarh Muslim University

Respected Sir,

As the ongoing agitation of teachers is now preparing to go on indefinite strike when the semester exams are about to be held, it is necessary to know the root of the origin of the ongoing teachers’ agitation. It is quite certain that the detractors have been given an opportunity by the VC himself. There is no justification for delay in the Selection Committee, most of the advertisements have been willfully expired, and they are not being re-advertised.

Most provocative is the malafide attempt at doing away with the Screening Committee for placement of lecturers in Senior Scale, for which, again there is no justification. The AMU ordinances formulated in accordance with the UGC rules envisaged in the 5th Pay Report, which is about to be replaced by 6th Pay Report are for screening. The JMI has adopted it (by doing away with Selection Committee). Moreover, a lecturer with Ph. D reaches the scale of 10,200/- after 4 years of service i.e. eligibility for senior scale (having done Orientation course during these 4 years). S/he, gets basic pay of 10,000/- in the senior scale. So, this in itself suggests against making the process unnecessarily complex and expensive and time taking and thereby inflicting inordinate delay. Apart from the legal (rules/ordinances) justifications, administrative prudence also advices against antagonizing a section of teachers and playing into the hands of the detractors, the management of whom requires greater dependence of the VC on his sycophants, which causes erosion of VC’s credibility.  In fact everybody on the campus is surprised by the tactical un-wisdom of the VC, Azis, whose insistence on doing away with the screening process is unnecessarily creating huge discomfitures for him alone.

Composition of the agitating leadership is also worth x-raying. It consists of two irreconcilable factions. Of which, one consists of 50% of the elected representatives of the teachers in the Executive Council (EC). This leadership is facing (unstoppable?) serious erosion of its support base (losing to the other 50% of the elected representatives of the teachers in the EC, who are indiscreetly loyal to the VC, Azis). This particular faction/gang is notorious for having thrived on violation/manipulation of rules in extracting patronage for its camp-followers. Ever since,

(a) Strict implementation of the UGC-JRF/NET for recruitment as lecturer,

(b) recruiting Guest Faculties by doing away with the Local Selection Committee (LSC) on full scale (to obtain exemptions from appearing before the LSC after 3 such exercises) and thereby rigging the permanent placements, and

(c) Enforcement of RTI Act,

This notorious gang is undergoing huge crises of survival. This gang has always thrived on its proximity with the VCs [or in adverse circumstances it has prudently gone in brief hibernation]. This time, having been denied that crucial proximity [despite loudly claiming to be the ‘king maker’ in the process of the empanelment of the incumbent VC in April-May 2007], this notorious gang is left with no other course but to go for agitation politics, espousing the legitimate grievances of the teachers.

In this backdrop, if at all the VC sincerely wishes to tame/subdue this notorious gang, he should not offer any such issue to this gang of detractors and thereby he should avoid playing into their hands.

Hiring another section of teachers (elected EC members) can not help the VC for long. In 1992, in a similar situation, the then VC, tried to intimidate the agitating teachers by hiring a gang of the teachers (espousing shameful loyalty with the VC), but it got thoroughly exposed & discredited, and then the VC had to abandon the loyalist teachers only to seek rescue for himself by hiring lumpen students. Needless to say, it proved all the more dangerous resulting into an ignominious undoing/exit of the VC, M.N. Faruqi, [despite the fact that he rendered yeoman services like bringing so many professional courses, fund, computerization etc], condemned in the editorials of the national English dailies.

It also needs to be added here that the gang leader (of the loyalist teachers) also withered away from the campus. Incidentally, a left-over of that villainous and self destructive gang is now secretly wagging his tails behind the present couple of loyalist (elected teacher members of EC, who resorted to unruly activities on 4th Nov’08). It is more dangerous for the present VC, Azis to have ‘hired’ this gang of loyalist due also to the fact that the acting Finance Officer happens to be a close relative of this man, who has already created so many financial (&??) scandals against the VC, Azis. [This tail wagging Professor CLAIMS (only claims) to represent the ‘vocal’ section and second highest represented province in AMU]

The Way Out: a) Immediately start screening process for placement in senior scale; (b) Announce the schedule of selection committees for different Faculty/Departments of studies, (c) Re-advertise the expired vacancies. All these three efforts will lead to desertions of whatever support base (particularly among few Guest Faculties) is left with the agitating elected teacher members of the EC. His politics of agitation and widely reported ‘fight’ with the VC is making desertions unstoppable. This faction is fighting very hard for survival. In order to get rid of this gang, the VC should no longer insist on taking imprudent, unwise steps, he should allay the misgivings of the aggrieved teachers before 24th November (the next GBM), so that the agitating leader does not take the credit of the fulfillment of the legitimate demand.   

Waiting for Reply soon

Zafar Khan
H-104, Batla House, new Delhi-25

Comments
Add NewSearch
Adeeb Unregistered | Nov-13-08
wow
what a great, incisive analysis, but does VC listen? Sooner he listens, better it would be for him and for the AMU.
PNR Unregistered | Nov-13-08
The VC must listen to this genuine issue
Asmer Beg - Bad advisors of VC Unregistered | Nov-16-08
Mojahid Beg's chamchas (lecturers) are not eligible for placement in Senior Scale, who Vc wants to place them from backdoor, in violation of UGC rules. Precisely because of this he is advising/misguiding the VC to have selection committee rather than screening committee for such placement.
This Beg will let VC down into bigger crisis.
Anonymous - VC's Responsibilities Unregistered | Nov-16-08
On 24th November, in the General Body Meeting (GBM)of the AMU Teachers' Association [led by third rate chamchas], in all likelihood, indefinite strike is going to be decided. Whether or not such undesirable but inevitable situation emerges, the VC and his dangerous advisors/goons have to be blamed squarely. There is certainly no justification for delaying selection committees and replacing the process of screening to place lecturers in senior scale ishooribly unjustified. It is heer hooliganism on the part of the establishment and nothing else.
Abdul Rasheed Khan - Illegal promotion Unregistered | Nov-16-08
In the office memo no. Admin/LD/01/T dated 1.1.2008 under 19(3) of AMU Act, he has obliged his people. For example, take the case of Dr. Mohd Mobin, Reader in Applied Chemistry (known as PK-3 and P.K. Abdul Mobin in the campus) at the S.No. 31of this memo. His date of placement in senior scale is 24.9.1993 His date of placement as Reader (MPS) is 20.3.1997 He became eligible for placement in Reader (CAS) 24.9.1998. The present VC has ordered under 19(3) to place him in Reader (CAS) and to give him two advance increments for Ph.D. from 20.3.1997 i.e. before the date of his eligibility 24.9.1998. He understands this case of his friend very well. While the placement in reader under CAS can be given on 27th July 1998 or after completion of 5 years of service as senior lecturer whichever is later under Vth Pay Commission i.e. not before 27th July 1998 and not before completion of 5 years of service as senior lecturer. He has been placed in reader under CAS only after 3 years 5 months 26 days of service as senior lecturer and also before 27.7.1998. This has disturbed the inter se seniority of the teachers in several departments. The similar is the case of several others covered in this circular. I fully accept that an administrator has the full right to choose his advisors according to his requirement to run the system and have the right to oblige the deserving men in different ways but not by doing injustice to other staff members. Dr. A. R. Khan M.A., Ph.D. Jamianagar, New Delhi-110025. Email: khanar2002@yahoo.com
Anonymous - Illegal recruitment Unregistered | Nov-16-08
N.A.K. Durrani was recruited as lecturer when he was merely B.A from a provincial university of India. Then he did M.A in full time when he was simultaneously a full time lecturer in AMU but could obtain only 53%, whereas the UGC requires 55% for lecturers. Such kind of illegalities led AMU to give him quick promotions, he was also applicant for the post of Controller of Exams and Admissions in AMU. Every now and then the VC nominate him in one or the other committee. There is regionalism also going on. Could you please upload the C.Vs of such illegally recruited menaces of AMU?
Anonymous - Teachers as Goons Unregistered | Nov-16-08
What can happen when the teachers are offering themselves to be hired as goons and they are disrupting the General Body Meetings? Yet such people are elected by the teachers.
Things are horribly bad.
Satheesan (D/O MIL), Mobin (D/o Applied Chem), Mojahid Beg, JNMC, all are goons/chamchas of the VC, Azis
mohammad allam - Be brother in arm Unregistered | Nov-17-08
There were two parties dominating the Mughal court,Irani and Turani.Both these groups in later Mughal period were fighting for the Governorship and Mansab.Both were conspiring against each other to defame each other.A third party came in circle and played the politics of "divide and rule".This third party got the hold and after a period finished the Mughal Empire.Both Turani and Irani not lost only the power but also prestige.All these two included the Mughlal Emperor acould not dream such a disgrace and uproot from the Indian History.After the end of the Mughal empire these two were no where.I also fear that may be in coming days the history not repeat itslef in A.M.U. like Mughal.
So i can just request to all of you and including university administartion to sit down together and solve the problem to save this last centre of learning and pride of Indian Muslims.
Anonymous Unregistered | Nov-17-08
M. Rahman will broker peace between VC Azis and Hafeez Ilyas during 22-24 November 2008.
Write comment
Name:
Title:
Security Image

Powered by JoomlaCommentCopyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.Homepage: http://cavo.co.nr/

 
< Prev   Next >
© 2010 Aligarh Muslim University - Mera Chaman
Terms & Conditions